,jpeg/000/318/017/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/013/784/233/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/015/583/296/v2/320x180.206.jpg)
,jpeg/006/540/858/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/004/176/501/v2/320x180.212.jpg)
,jpeg/002/452/427/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/010/561/337/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/006/634/047/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/013/964/951/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/006/781/153/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/011/358/756/1280x720.1.jpg)
Comments
22
I'm intrigued! What exactly is "very nice" about a totally blank profile that has no access to, which is set to a "visible to friends only" mode (which at the time of you writing this, are not yet a friend of his) and which has two uploaded videos (this public "dance" video of terrible quality that appears to be shot in 1993 with a vhs camcorder; and another inaccessible private video which is set to "friends only" (which again, at the time of you writing this, are not yet a friend of his)? I'd love to understand what is so "nice" about someone with a totally blank profile and one uploaded video of terrible quality and mild content?
